The problem
An alt-text checker can show what is missing. It cannot reliably decide what an image means in the context of the page. A photograph, logo, icon, chart, and decorative divider do not need the same treatment.
Focused implementation
Image Alt Text Cleanup
Image markup that reflects the role each visual actually plays on the page, without keyword stuffing or invented detail.
Best fit
The engagement
A specific repair with a visible finish line.
This page makes the buying decision explicit: the symptom that qualifies, the work that is performed, the boundary that protects both sides, and the evidence delivered at the end.
What changes
Image markup that reflects the role each visual actually plays on the page, without keyword stuffing or invented detail.
Primary boundary
Up to 20 images across up to 5 URLs on one domain. The service covers alt attributes and closely related contextual recommendations, not a full accessibility audit or image-production project.
Exact scope
What is included—and what is deliberately excluded.
These boundaries prevent a focused implementation project from quietly turning into an unlimited campaign.
Included in this service
- Review of up to 20 images across up to 5 URLs on one site.
- Custom alt text for meaningful in-scope images.
- Decorative-image recommendations where blank alt text is appropriate.
- Implementation where access permits.
- A final verification sheet showing the image location and published text.
Not included
- A complete accessibility conformance audit.
- Image compression, redesign, photography, or custom illustration.
- Complex long descriptions for large data visualizations without source information.
- Bulk cleanup across hundreds or thousands of media-library items.
Scope note: Up to 20 images across up to 5 URLs on one domain. The service covers alt attributes and closely related contextual recommendations, not a full accessibility audit or image-production project.
Delivery process
Four stages from intake to verified handoff.
The exact technical work changes by service. The accountability model does not: establish the baseline, confirm the boundary, implement the approved work, and verify the live state.
Intake and baseline
Confirm the business facts, affected property, desired outcome, current state, and access required to diagnose the issue responsibly.
Scope confirmation
Identify the in-scope work, exclusions, dependencies, owner decisions, and third-party controls before material implementation begins.
Implementation
Complete the agreed changes in the available site, profile, analytics, directory, server, or content environment.
Verification and handoff
Check the live result, record evidence, separate completed work from pending controls, and state the next practical action.
Prepare the work
What you provide and what you receive.
Fast, accurate implementation depends on access and business facts. The handoff then gives another owner, developer, marketer, or provider enough context to understand the final state.
What is needed from you
- A page flagged by an image alt-text checker.
- A service page, article, gallery, or resource section with a manageable number of images.
- A business that wants useful, human-reviewed descriptions rather than automated keyword insertion.
What the handoff contains
- Written change record and verification result.
Accountability artifact
The final record separates completed work from outside control.
“Done” should mean more than a message saying the task was handled. The handoff identifies the object changed, the verification method, the current result, and any remaining owner or third-party dependency.
Verification logIllustrative format
PASSAgreed implementation is live on the intended propertyVerified
PASSDesktop and mobile behavior checked where applicableVerified
OPENExternal platform processing or owner evidence remainsAssigned
Before checkout
Questions about this service
These answers clarify the most likely scope and outcome misunderstandings before payment.
Should every image have descriptive alt text?
No. Decorative images often should use an empty alt attribute so they do not distract assistive-technology users.
Will you add keywords to the alt text?
Only when a relevant term naturally describes the image. The purpose is accurate context, not keyword repetition.
What about logos and buttons?
Functional images are described according to the action or identity they communicate, not merely their visual appearance.
Does this guarantee an accessibility score?
No. Alt text is one part of accessibility. This service does not replace a full audit or legal review.
Do you rename image files?
Not by default. Renaming can create broken paths or duplicate media. A safe filename change may be recommended but is outside the core scope unless specifically agreed.
Related paths
Compare adjacent services before committing.
Choose the smallest service that fully matches the actual problem.
Ready to move from diagnosis to implementation?
Review the scope above, then continue to Stripe for the current payment terms. Questions about fit should be resolved before purchase—not discovered after it.